PARTITION SALES IN CALIFORNIA – THE PARTITION OF REAL PROPERTY ACT (PRPA)

ANAND LAW > PARTITION SALES IN CALIFORNIA – THE PARTITION OF REAL PROPERTY ACT (PRPA)
  1. THE SALES PROCESS UNDER THE PARTITION OF REAL PROPERTY ACT
  2. THE BUY-OUT PROCESS BEFORE A SALE UNDER THE PARTITION OF REAL PROPERTY ACT
    1. Notice of Market Value
    2. Election to Buy Out Co-Owner’s Interest
    3. Notice of Buy Out-Option
  3. THE PROCESS IF NO CO-OWNER BUYS OUT THE OTHERS’ INTEREST
    1. Partition in Kind Looked to First if Buy-Out Unsuccessful
    2. Partition by Sale Under The Partition of Real Property Act
    3. What If No Offers are Received Above the Price Set by the Court?
    4. Sale by Bids or Sale by Auction
  4. PREMIER PARTITION ATTORNEYS

COURT-ORDERED SALES UNDER THE PARTITION OF REAL PROPERTY ACT (PRPA)

The Partition of Real Property Act (the “PRPA”) applies to all real property in California that is held by tenants in common. The only exception is if there is a written agreement governing partition to the property. The PRPA applies to all actions filed after January 1, 2023. California Code of Civil Procedure (“CCP”) Section 874.311

Under the PRPA, an option to buy out interests is provided to cotenants who did not request a sale. Pursuant to Section 874.317, the court must “send notice to the parties that any cotenant except a cotenant that requested partition by sale may buy out all the interests of the cotenants that requested partition by sale.” We refer to this notice as the “Notice of Market Value”.

After the Notice of Market Value is sent, the parties that didn’t request a sale have 45 days to make an election (that is, to file their formal notice stating they want to buy out the others’ interests). If there are defaulted parties, they also will have to be dealt with through this process, as they have interests in the property regardless of whether they are participating in the lawsuit or not—their interests must also be bought out under this court-supervised process.

If an election is made, the court must send another notice, this one stating that a party (or parties) elected to buy out others’ interest(s). We refer to this notice as the “Notice of Buy-Out Option”. The purchase price will be the market value determined by the court “multiplied by [their] fractional ownership of the entire parcel” (§874.317). This process may be quite nuanced depending on the number of parties involved. The court must set a date, no sooner than 60 days from the “Notice of Buy-Out Option “by which electing cotenants shall pay their apportioned price into the court.” §874.317. This process can have various twists and turns depending on the factors including differences in opinion n market value, the number of parties, and whether there are defaulted parties.

PARTITION IN KIND LOOKED TO FIRST IF BUY-OUT UNSUCCESSFUL

Once the buy-out process makes its way to a conclusion, if no party successfully completes a buy-out, the court must look to partition in kind, meaning the physical division of the property. Under the PRPA, Partition in Kind is governed by Section 874.319.

If Partition in Kind is not ordered, the court shall go through a process for a Partition by Sale.

PARTITION BY SALE UNDER THE PARTITION OF REAL PROPERTY ACT

Although the PRPA supplements the pre-existing Partition Code (which still exists, and is in full effect),

This process commences with the selection of a broker. Either the parties agree on broker within, or the court will appoint one. §874.320.

If the broker receives offer(s) that above the previously-determined market value, a sale can be competed. The broker is required to file a report, containing the following:

1. A description of the property to be sold to each buyer.

2. The name of each buyer.

3. The proposed purchase price.

4. The terms and conditions of the proposed sale, including the terms of any owner financing.

5. The amounts to be paid to lienholders.

6. A statement of contractual or other arrangements or conditions of the broker’s commission.

7. Other material facts relevant to the sale.

WHAT IF NO OFFERS ARE RECEIVED ABOVE THE PRICE SET BY THE COURT

If the broker does not receive an offer that is above the market value the court previously set, the court can

1. Approve highest offer

2. Redetermine the value of the property

3. Order property sold by sealed bids or at an auction

SALE BY BIDS or SALE BY AUCTION

If the court orders the property sold by sealed bids or at an auction, the court sets terms and conditions. We advise our clients and the court as to the terms and conditions that are prudent under such a scenario.

EXTENSIVE EXPERIENCE & EXPERTISE

We have counseled and represented parties in connection with real property ranging in value from $300,000 to $25,000,000, including residential, commercial, mixed use, vacant land, multi-family, industrial, and apartments. ANAND LAW has successfully represented parties in property cases between spouses, boyfriend and girlfriend, siblings, relatives, and business partners. We handled partition cases throughout the state of California, and have the experience and dedication to create the best plan of action for your particular situation. ANAND LAW is a partition lawyer that can end your co-ownership expeditiously and ensure that you get every penny you are entitled to.

Partition Referee Los Angeles, Orange, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Ventura, Riverside, San Bernardino
California Partition Referee and Receiver
California Partition Referee and Reciever
Associated Press
CBS
LA Times
The Orange County Register
The Washington Post
SFGATE
The Wall Street Journal
SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY SUN
The San Diego Union-Tribune
San Francisco Chronicle
Sacramento Bee
U.S. News & World Report

We speak: English, Spanish, Hindi, Punjabi, Urdu

ANAND LAW is composed of partition lawyers, accountants, and real estate brokers.  We represent parties in partition cases where we resolve co-ownership disputes throughout California, from San Diego to Sacramento, and beyond–including in the cities and areas of Los Angeles, Pasadena, Arcadia, Burbank, La Canada Flintridge, Covina, West Covina, Downey, Santa Monica, Glendale, Eagle Rock, Hollywood, Atwater Village, Echo Park, Glassell Park, Loz Feliz, Silverlake, Highland Park, Boyle Heights, Hancock Park, Cheviot Hills, Koreatown, Miracle Mile, Mid City, Venice, Van Nuys, Encino, Studio City, Sherman Oaks, Panorama City, North Hills, West Hills, Thousand Oaks, Calabasas, Granada Hills, Long Beach, Glendora, Anaheim, Inglewood, Santa Ana, Beverly Hills, Pomona, Marina Del Rey, Playa Del Rey, Mar Vista, Culver City, Cheviot Hills, Holmby Hills, Westchester, El Segundo, Hermosa Beach, Redondo Beach, Manhattan Beach, Huntington Beach, Orange, Irvine, Costa Mesa, Newport Beach, Moorpark, Fresno, Stockton, San Francisco, Berkeley, Oakland, Petaluma, Marin, Sausalito, Mill Valley, Tiburon, Daly City, Fremont, Stinson Beach, Redwood City, Berkeley, San Leandro, Napa, Santa Rosa, Costa Mesa, Huntington Beach, Santa Ana, Laguna Beach, Laguna Nigel, San Clemente, Ladera Ranch, Tustin, Lake Forest, Mission Viejo, Coto De Caza, Rancho Santa Margarita, Laguna Hills, Corona Del Mar, Carlsbad, La Jolla, Encinitas, Vista, Del Mar, Chula Vista, and communities throughout Los Angeles, Orange, Santa Barbara, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Luis Obispo, San Diego, Ventura, San Francisco, Alameda, and Mendocino Counties.

The information on this site is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The information contained is not intended to be a complete recitation of the law, and is provided only as general information in an area—it may not contain all nuances of the law, and is not guaranteed to be correct or complete.  ANAND LAW PC (“ALPC”) expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on the information contained on our site.

We invite you to contact us for more information by calling  (888) 323-0606, or submitting our contact form here. However, contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until an attorney-client relationship has been established by a signed legal services agreement. Unless and until you and ALPC formally establish an attorney-client relationship, ALPC does not represent you in any manner, and has no duty to you.  Further, any email or other correspondence sent prior to a formal relationship being established, and without request from ALPC, will not be privileged or confidential, and subject to disclosure to other parties. Please review our complete Terms of Use.